🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional member states